Tuesday, March 1, 2016

A Tale of Two Saviors

Der Touchback and Trad Vlad.

First, Trump.  Rumors are focusing on an alleged tape of Trump talking "off the record" to the NY Times, in which he discusses his "flexibility" on immigration; in other words, his willingness, once elected, to betray his base and forget all his bombastic promises about deportation, walls, Muslim bans, and all the rest.

Is this true?  Who knows?  It could of course just be another Establishment ploy to discredit Trump before "Super Tuesday."  But then I remember Trump, back in 2012, denouncing Romney's "self-deportation" as too harsh (!), and his more recent comments about "touchback immigration," and I can very well believe the rumors to be true.  But, again, we cannot yet know for sure.

I would like to summarize - once again - my "take" on Trump.. It boils down to three major points:

1. He is not one of us.  At best, he is a Negro-loving civic nationalist.  At worst, he is a complete fraud, someone tricking the rubes with no intention of following through if and when elected.  I do not trust him. He is not worthy of a minute of support, although he may be worthy of a vote assuming he is not unmasked as a fraud before then.

2. Trump's usefulness is as a tool.  There is a public perception that he is some sort of pro-White bigot extremist - and although that is not true even at his best, the perception can be used to destabilize the multiculturalist regime.

3. Trump's utility exists only as long as the false public perception is maintained.  If Trump is revealed as a fraud, the perception is shattered and his usefulness is at an end.

Then there is the "movement" and its quota queen "leadership" as well as the HBD/game crowd, fawning over Trump as the latest "White savior" in the long line of failures and disappointments: Reagan, Thatcher, Ron Paul, Putin, etc.  Is the "movement" so stupid and short-sighted that they'll let themselves be humiliated again?

If and when Trump is unmasked as a fraud I for one am going to hold accountable all the little Trump boys in the "movement" as well as HBD/game. for once again leading Whites into a cul-de-sac and making racial nationalism into a jilted laughing stock.  That will all be discussed here, of that have no doubt.

Second, Putin.  We see his regime covering up a horrific crime committed by an Asiatic, likely against an ethnic Russian child.  Emphasis added:


MOSCOW, March 1 (UPI) -- The spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin defended the decision by major Russian television networks not to report on a nanny's apparent beheading of a 4-year-old girl.

Russia's major television networks, including Rossia-1, Channel One, NTV and Moscow's TVTs, did not cover the story Monday in Moscow. Gyulchekhra Bobokulova, 38, from Uzbekistan, was arrested after she was caught on video apparently carrying the severed head of Nastya, a 4-year-old girl who was in her care. 
 
Russian networks are heavily monitored by the government and freedom of the press as a whole is notoriously undermined. Russia ranks 152nd out of 180 countries in Reporters Without Borders' 2015 World Press Freedom Index.

Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Tuesday said he agreed with the networks' decision and said the "terrible tragedy" that occurred should not be linked to Bobokulova's Muslim heritage. 
"Don't you link this with some nationalities question. It was a terrible tragedy, either in terms of its inhumanness or in terms of insanity. The investigation will possibly find out," Peskov said.

"In this respect I fully agree with the [federal] channels," Peskov said when asked about why the crime was absent from the major networks.

Unidentified employees of different networks said broadcasters received "recommendations" to stay away from the story by Russian officials, citing a government desire to avoid attention on national ethnic or religious issues.

So, how is this different from the American media covering up stories of Blacks attacking Whites?  Or the European media covering up refugee/migrant crime?  There is no difference.  Once again, Putin's Russia is revealed as an anti-majoritian multiculturalist regime, where in the interests of ethnic Russians are sacrificed to the cult of diversity.  Like the Republican Establishment, Putin has calculated that future demographics favor the non-Russian, non-Slavic, non-White minorities of Russia, and therefore to safeguard the power of the Russian state, minorities must be pandered to and the majority ignored - just as the GOP dismisses their White base in favor of the growing colored masses.

Prison of the nation indeed!  The Russian people are to be sacrificed on the alter of the "Eurasian Union."

Why is this behavior denounced when it occurs in the West, but excused as a "deep chess game" when it occurs in Russia?  Answer: "deep chess game" is a euphemism for "deep CHEST game" as effete weaklings in the "movement" become breathlessly infatuated with the "strong man" Putin riding bare-chested through the Siberian wilderness. It is a cult of personality with a faint whiff of homoerotic ardor, and the "movement" should be ashamed of itself for this.  But then I remember that the "movement" is incapable of feeling shame, or guilt, or any sense of honorable accountability whatsoever.